Sam Barry vs Thomas Schoorel Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W L L
Form
L W L W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Barry 1 - 0 Schoorel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Barry winning 2 and Schoorel winning 0. The last match between Barry and Schoorel was at the Netherlands F5, 17-08-2015, Second, Clay with Sam Barry getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sam Barry | 1 |
| Thomas Schoorel | 0 |
Netherlands F5(17-08-2015)
6
1
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sam Barry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Emil Reinberg
Player
Sam Barry
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Sam Barry
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Barry
Player
Trent Bryde
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Sam Barry
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Sam Barry
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Barry
Player
Luke Johnson
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Sam Barry
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Barry
Player
Isaac Stoute
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Sam Barry
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sam Barry
Player
Sadio Doumbia
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Schoorel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Thomas Schoorel
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(3) ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Ungur
Player
Thomas Schoorel
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (303/212) | Win/Loss | 63% (252/149) |
| 58% (685/506) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (541/361) |
| 53% (6003/5317) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4602/4096) |
| 60% (171/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (42/28) |
| 60% (48/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (166/93) |
| 57% (83/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (40/23) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1143 | Aces Total | 988 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 424 | Total Double Faults | 521 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 584.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 598.7 |
| 69% (9149/13211) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7383/12178) |
| 71% (6488/9149) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (5370/7383) |
| 52% (2110/4063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2399/4795) |
| 38% (506/1317) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (400/1065) |
| 38% (5234/13824) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4590/12581) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 22% (2/7) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (22/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (30/37) | Challenger W/L | 58% (88/65) |
| 62% (271/163) | Futures W/L | 70% (131/55) |
| 60% (301/502) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (247/389) |
| 14% (1/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 52% (78/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (76/144) |
| 53% (82/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (64/100) |
| 85% (298/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (247/222) |
| 15% (298/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (247/24) |
| 23% (217/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (153/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
